quiet example.

11:57 AM Edit This 4 Comments »
Sometimes if you aren't watching, you don't notice the small and powerful things. And, as I have been accused of not sharing my spiritual moments ( :) ), I wanted to share one of the highlights of mine and Justin's Christmas experience this year. As you all know, from my previous post, our house was b-u-s-y busy this year with family and friends all around. But, in the middle of it all, very quietly... my littlest brother grew up. Now, he grew up physically a couple of years ago with a massive growth spurt. This was different. Without saying anything to anyone, he passed out socially conscious gifts to everyone. He ordered his gift wrapping paper from invisible children. He gave me Tom's Shoes. My dad Kibo Coffee. My mom a necklace made by a woman in Uganda.

It was quiet. It was beautiful. Don't think we didn't notice.

(Great... now I am teary eyed at my computer at work.)

Back to reality

10:52 AM Edit This 3 Comments »

Well, the last of our family leaves today. It has been quite a whirlwind of families, emotions, presents, and fun the past ten days or so. We had 12 adults + 2 babies at my enormously long awesome dining table for Christmas dinner.


Now it is time for J and I to get back to real life. I am at work this morning. J is back to teaching a Winter Session class at RU. Emadu will have to adjust back to a much quieter house and playing by himself (sometimes...). J and I already started talking about getting back to the envelope system of money management. An envelope of cash for monthly groceries, one for our weekly allowances, etc... This semester will be much tighter as I am only working 30 hours and J isn't on fellowship anymore and is only teaching one class as an adjunct. Sad to say, he may be back to doing Kaplan training which I know he isn't wild about. But--it will even things back out so that we are both working a close to equal amount outside of the house. And, it will mean that we both get to have a good amount of time at home with Em and each other.

Our six year anniversary is this weekend. Sweet.

So, my question to you, oh blogworld, is how does a family of three do all the traveling that is required to keep up with family and friends in far off places while having a limited number of vacation days and limited fundage resources?? Here are the trips we'd like to make in the next few months:

Florida (grandparents who still haven't gotten to meet Emadu in the flesh)

California (friends as close as family who also haven't gotten to meet our boy--including our goddaughter)

Arkansas (parents)

Colorado (friends having a baby in the spring)

Tennessee (friends having a baby in January)

Michigan (family who haven't met Emadu)


Doctor Visit and The Events of The Day

7:09 PM Edit This 6 Comments »














Yesterday we schlepped into NYC despite the snowy rain to see Dr. Aronson for Emadu's 9 month visit. Turns out Em's doing well. Just like we thought. He is right around 50th percentile for height and weight and about 75th percentile for head circumference. He weighs 20lbs 13 oz.

Oh yeah... and he has some bronchitis like virus. I thought it was just a cold. Ooops :) So, we're nebulizing for the next week. He looks pretty pitiful, but daddy is a pro at the nebulizer, so we've got this locked down! Em's spent the day the way we all get to spend the day in the Adams Burton house when we're sick... in his jammies. It helps when you have really cute jammies :)

Next up: Planning for (and cleaning for?) both families to visit for the holidays. We'll finish up our shopping tomorrow, and then wrap and I guess clean the house...

Adventures in Parenting

5:25 PM Edit This 4 Comments »
I think I shared this article with the blog back in the summer when it was originally published in the NYTimes. However, now that we have been officially parenting for several months now, I thought it would be nice to revisit the article and concept of Equal Parenting and see how it has all shaken out.

The article is When Mom and Dad Share it All by Lisa Belkin and was in the New York Times Magazine on June 15, 2008. I was originally struck by this article because it articulated my and Justin's parenting goals and philosophies like I'd never read in print before. We tried to describe our parenting plans to friends and family and kept using the phrase 'co-parenting' which we soon learned is generally reserved for divorced couples who are sharing custody. But what we meant was exactly what this article says: Equal Parenting. We have since referred to the opening of the article several times wherein the mother, on her first day back to work after four months of maternity leave, lovingly gives her husband a list on a post-it before she leaves. The list contains their new daughter's daily routine--things she thinks he should know as he is going to stay home with her for the day. He promptly rips up the post-it note, and she got the message.

The message was something they'd agreed on prior to even getting married:
They would not be the kind of parents their parents had been — the mother-knows-best mold. Nor the kind their friends were — the “involved” dad married to the stressed-out working mom. Nor even, as Marc put it, “the stay-at-home dad, who is cooed at for his sensitivity but who is as isolated and financially vulnerable as the stay-at-home-mom.” We have had several 'list' moments where I've told Justin things he already knows about Em's schedule or needs, what we need at the store, bills that need to be paid, etc... He calmly reminds me that he is ripping up the post-it note.

This is how the article describes Equal Parenting:

Instead, they would create their own model, one in which they were parenting partners. Equals and peers. They would work equal hours, spend equal time with their children, take equal responsibility for their home. Neither would be the keeper of the mental to-do lists; neither of their careers would take precedence. Both would be equally likely to plan a birthday party or know that the car needs oil or miss work for a sick child or remember (without prompting) to stop at the store for diapers and milk. They understood that this would mean recalibrating their career ambitions, and probably their income, but what they gained, they believed, would be more valuable than what they lost.


Pros, so far, of this parenting style include:
*The space for me to retain my 'self' pre-mommyhood.
*Understanding of both partners of how challenging it is to parent
*Load-sharing; I think both of us are less burdened than we would be if one of us were PC (primary caregiver)
*Em grows up thinking that there are multiple ways to do things.
*A secure attachment to both of us.
***The constant reminder of why I married who I did. By which I mean, there are so many parts of J that are different than me. Bits of knowledge he knows that I don't know, methods of accomplishing a task that I don't use, preferences for foods and clothes that are different than what I would choose. All unique things that have been special to me and have influenced my attraction to him and my love for him. And Emadu gets to experience all of that as equally as he gets to experience the unique parts of me. I think ultimately that this is the greatest benefit. He benefits from having all of both of us. Not just daddy as a babysitter, daddy as the fun guy who plays. Not just mommy as the nurturer, the housekeeper, the career woman.

Still working on:
*Taking on my equal share of typical man duties like getting the oil changed.
*Finding a way to not roll my eyes when people comment on all Justin does for the baby. "Wow, he changes diapers?" "Really? He gets up with the baby in the night?"
*Not judging some of J's clothing choices for Em. :)

Secret Family Getaway (Poconos)

5:17 PM Edit This 0 Comments »




Boston

5:14 PM Edit This 1 Comment »

(Auntie Jenn looks hot for having just had surgery, right?)

Angels in the Wilderness

9:45 PM Edit This 0 Comments »
**J wrote this and presented it as the Call to Worship at our church on the day of EmAdu's dedication. I think of it often (and usually get teary). It is worth reading all of it. Even if you've heard it before.

Call to Worship 9/21 – Dedication Sunday
Two Sundays before we left for Ethiopia, I shuffled into a pew at Christ Church New Brunswick, the local Episcopal church we attend when we aren’t in Stamford, to hear a lesson about Ishmael. I have to admit that I wasn’t completely present. My mind was racing through the seemingly endless list of tasks we had to accomplish before flying to Addis.

Rev. Deborah Meister, the rector at Christ Church, grabbed my attention quickly, though. After reviewing Sarah’s intolerance of Hagar and her son, as well as Abraham’s unwillingness to protect that son, Rev. Meister described Hagar’s despair in the wilderness. She has some water Abraham gave her, but it quickly runs dry. She has nearly lost all hope that her son will survive when she encounters an angel in the wilderness who ministers to her and the child.

This is the story of all parents, who eventually release their children into a wilderness, ‘trusting God,’ as John Ames, the main character in Marilynne Robinson’s Gilead understands it, ‘to honor the parents’ love for [that child] by assuring that there will indeed be angels in that wilderness.’ (219) (Hat tip to Rev. Meister)

As my son grows older, he will know Kathryn and I as his parents, and we will shower him with love and support. He will also know of his first parents, Ayelech and Firew. He will know of his first family’s profound trust in people they did not know to provide him with the love and support they would not be present to give. A love that they have modeled for him in what is perhaps the greatest demonstration of love imaginable – sacrifice. We are his two families made into one.

Importantly, he will also know of one other group of people that make up our unlikely family. After he left his first family, but before he knew us, Adu was in a bureaucratic wilderness. We all waited for 13 court dates to pass, for visas to be issued, for immigration papers to be approved, for two governments separated by thousands of miles and multiple language barriers to meticulously grind out the particulars of an ethical adoption. And all the while, Adu was stuck in limbo, meandering through a bureaucratic wilderness.

But there were angels in that wilderness. Men and women who attended to Adu’s every need, who loved him when the two families who were desperate to love him could not be with him.
There was Dr. Tsegaye, who heads the Wide Horizons for Children program in Ethiopia and who has set an ethical standard that many more countries in Africa will soon follow.
There was Sister Askale, the head nurse for the infants, who works miracles for children who haven’t had access to all that they need when they come to her, and who commits herself so entirely to her work that the departure of each child is the occasion for the greatest joy and deepest sorrow for her.

There were Girma and Agirso, the social workers in the Sidama Zone who worked directly with Adu’s family in assisting them in their adoption plan. After meeting with Adu’s first family, we had lunch with Girma, who spoke with a fiery passion about his work in the region, about the importance of serving families in a manner that allows them to stay together, that makes adoption a last resort, and that provides a safe place for families in crisis to seek and receive help.

There were Eskedar and Sinidu, who oversaw the guest house where all of the adoptive families stayed; Mulat, who organized all aspects of the trip and drove us all around town; guards who knew all the babies’ names and played soccer with the older children; and countless names and faces we don’t know who navigated Adu and his family through the complex legal process and assured that this adoption was ethical and in everyone’s best interest.

And then there were Amarech and Mulu, the nannies that directly cared for Adu for the six weeks he was in Wide Horizon’s care. As they had done for so many babies before and will do for many more after, they nurtured Adu in every way imaginable. When he was hungry, they fed him. When he was thirsty, they gave him something to drink. When he was naked, they clothed him. When he was sick, they cared for him.

With no direct ties to his family and no expectation of ever seeing him again, everyone associated with Wide Horizons for Children in Ethiopia worked tirelessly to provide Adu with everything he needed. They were his angels in the bureaucratic wilderness, and they form another extension of our family now.

On Sunday in Ethiopia, when we were with Girma, he told us to come home and tell everyone what we saw. Tell them of the need, yes – there are an estimated 5 million orphans in Ethiopia – but also tell of the work that is being done so that others may be encouraged by it and seek ways to pitch in.

A few days later, at a coffee ceremony in the Big Kids House mere hours before we caught our flight home, Dr. Tsegaye stood before us, telling again of the agency’s commitment to the families it works with in Ethiopia. And he echoed what we had heard earlier in the week. Go, he said, and tell what you have seen here.

And so, this morning, I tell you what I saw – I saw angels in the wilderness.

The call to worship today is really a call to service. It’s a call for us to empty ourselves and minister to people we don’t know with the expectation of little in return. It’s a call to march out into a wilderness and serve whomever we find there. It’s a call to answer the hope and the faith of others until there is no wilderness without an angel there to help.

He's FAMOUS!!

3:08 PM Edit This 4 Comments »
Justin sent EmAdu's picture into one of the blogs we read--antiracist parent. And look who is featured today!!

Adoption Truth.

2:40 PM Edit This 2 Comments »
If you have any interest in international adoption, you have to read this article.

(thanks, straightmagic for the link.)

More later about this. But, this is why we went with WHFC. I can trust that this didn't happen with us.

Funny Names

3:04 PM Edit This 5 Comments »
Ok. So, J was on the phone with our doctor's office yesterday, trying to get Adu an appointment for a Flu Shot. Well, you see, we haven't taken Adu to our doctor yet because we've continued to see Dr. Aronson (and probably will until we can't afford it or she kicks us out of her practice), but we do plan on making our doctor Adu's primary care physician so that we have somewhere close to take him if we need to. But, because we haven't done this yet, the nice nurse at the doctor's office was explaining to J that insurance won't cover both places and we should try to get the Flu Shot with Aronson. You should know that Adu's legal official name currently is Adugna (AHH-doon-yah) Justin Burton because that is how the courts roll in Ethiopia. After he's been here with us 6 months, we'll go to U.S. court and have his name changed to Emmett Adugna Firew Burton (the name we already call him at home). Doctors' offices, though, use the legal name. Most places just look at the name, look at you, and admit that they don't know how to say it or badly butcher it. This nurse nicely decided that she would dive in and say his name with confidence. She didn't pause, didn't skip a beat when she said, "If you bring Ganuda here, the insurance won't pay for him to see Dr. Aronson anymore."

Ganuda. Ganuda makes me giggle. We decided that it sounds like a cheese (Gouda?) or a pasta dish. Try it... say it out loud... Ganuda. (Gan-ooo-dah). You'll smile too.